🔗 Share this article

Turns out he was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Conflict Over Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this represents neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for using excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and later discard him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.